Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Who Are These People?

And Why Do I Have To Keep Providing Them With Oxygen and Money?


It seems that NY City Mayor Bloomberg is running around out there putting his money (and other donors money) where his mouth is, and the "advocates" for the homeless and the poor don't like the concept of responsibility and the correlation between choices, decisions, and life's outcomes:

NEW YORK - Poor residents will be rewarded for good behavior — like $300 for doing well on school tests, $150 for holding a job and $200 for visiting the doctor — under an experimental anti-poverty program that city officials detailed Monday.

The rewards have been used in other countries, including Brazil and Mexico, and have drawn widespread praise for changing behavior among the poor. Mayor Michael Bloomberg traveled to Mexico this spring to study the healthy lifestyle payments, also known as conditional cash transfers.

In New York, the two-year pilot program with about 14,000 participants will use private funds Bloomberg has raised because he did not want to spend government money on something that is highly experimental. More than $43 million has been raised toward the $53 million goal, Deputy Mayor Linda Gibbs said.

The theory behind cash rewards is that poor people are trapped in a cycle of repeated setbacks that keep them from climbing out of poverty. A person who doesn't keep up with his vaccinations and doctor's visits, for example, may get sick more often and struggle to stay employed.

Bloomberg, a billionaire Republican, said he believes paying people in such circumstances to make good decisions could help break those patterns. The program "gives New Yorkers in poverty a financial incentive to look ahead and make decisions that will improve their prospects for the future," he said in a statement.

But some critics have raised questions about cash reward programs, saying they promote the misguided idea that poor people could be successful if they just made better choices.

"It just reinforces the impression that if everybody would just work hard enough and change their personal behavior we could solve poverty in this country, and that's not reflected in the facts," said Margy Waller, co-founder of Inclusion, a research and policy group in Washington.

Waller, who served as a domestic policy adviser in the Clinton administration, said it would be more effective to focus on labor issues, such as making sure wage laws are enforced and improving benefits for working people.

Among the possible rewards in New York's program are $25 for attending parent-teacher conferences, $25 per month for a child who maintains a 95 percent school attendance record, $400 for graduating high school, $100 for each family member who sees the dentist every six months and $150 a month for adults who work full time.

Can you believe this crap...this idiot Ms. Waller bitching about people GIVING money willingly to people to help them change their lifestyle and conditions versus using the GOVERNMENT to FORCE private citizens to pay artificially high wages and pay taxes so that the government can try to accomplish exactly the same goals with the typical lack of success we've all seen since President Johnson's social experiments of the 1960's first took effect.

Look at this again...

But some critics have raised questions about cash reward programs, saying they promote the misguided idea that poor people could be successful if they just made better choices.

"It just reinforces the impression that if everybody would just work hard enough and change their personal behavior we could solve poverty in this country, and that's not reflected in the facts," said Margy Waller, co-founder of Inclusion, a research and policy group in Washington.

I don't know about you, but in my opinion it's experts and government idiots like this that keep the poor poor. While we're at it, I think that all of the negros, blacks, African Americans, people of color should take a good look at Jessy Jackson and Al Sharpton and see where their bread is buttered in the process.

No comments: